Main Article Content

Abstract

This research is motivated by the phenomenon of low emotional involvement and interest of students in Islamic Religious Education (PAI) learning, especially in students who experience a lag in understanding the material compared to their peers. The purpose of this study is to describe in depth how the implementation of the Teaching at the Right Level (TaRL) approach is implemented and analyze the dynamics of changes in student learning interest after this approach is implemented. This research uses a qualitative method with a case study type at SDN Cipeuyeum 04 Cianjur. The research subjects were selected purposively, including PAI teachers and fifth grade students who have varying learning abilities. Data collection techniques were carried out through participant observation, in-depth interviews, and documentation, with data analysis using the Miles and Huberman interactive model. The results of the study show that: (1) The implementation of TaRL changes interaction patterns in the classroom to be more inclusive through ability-based grouping; (2) Students' learning interest grows due to a sense of psychological safety, where students no longer feel embarrassed or afraid of making mistakes; (3) Personalization of materials eliminates cognitive pressure, thereby changing passive students into participatory ones.

Keywords

interest in learning pie case study teaching at the right level

Article Details

How to Cite
Irnawati, W., & Ilmiah, D. . (2026). Implementation Of The Teaching At The Right Level (Tarl) Approach In Improving Students’ Learning Interest In Pai Subjects: A Case Study At Sdn Cipeuyeum 04 Cianjur. Pasundan Social Science Development, 6(2), 379–388. https://doi.org/10.56457/pascidev.v6i2.339

References

  1. Agustini, N., & Sari, R. (2021). The effect of grouping students based on ability on learning engagement. Journal of Elementary Education, 9(2), 134–145.
  2. Arifin, Z. (2014). Learning evaluation: Principles, techniques, and procedures. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
  3. Banerjee, A. V., & Duflo, E. (2011). Poor economics: A radical rethinking of the way to fight global poverty. New York: PublicAffairs.
  4. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  5. Djamarah, SB, & Zain, A. (2013). Teaching and learning strategies. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
  6. Farazeni, A., Putri, M., & Rachman, D. (2020). The impact of level-based learning on students' learning anxiety. Journal of Educational Psychology, 12(1), 45–56.
  7. Fitriani, E. (2018). Increasing students' interest in learning through differentiated learning strategies in elementary schools. Journal of Elementary Education, 6(1), 21–29.
  8. International Development Research Centre. (2015). Teaching at the Right Level: Evidence from Kenya. Nairobi: IDRC.
  9. J-PAL. (2022). Teaching at the Right Level (TaRL). Cambridge, MA: Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab.
  10. Kurniawan, T. (2021). The effect of adaptive learning on students' motivation and interest in learning. Journal of Educational Innovation, 5(3), 201–210.
  11. Majid, A. (2013). Learning strategies. Bandung: Rosdakarya Youth.
  12. Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  13. Moleong, LJ (2017). Qualitative research methodology. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
  14. Muhaimin. (2012). Paradigm of Islamic education: Efforts to make Islamic religious education in schools more effective. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
  15. Nasrulloh, M., & Muhajiroh, H. (2020). Fun learning method to increase elementary school students' interest in learning. Creative Journal of Elementary Education, 7(1), 11–20.
  16. Nastiar, F., Putra, Y., & Lestari, A. (2021). Implementation of the STEAM model in increasing elementary school students' interest in learning. Journal of Educational Sciences, 15(2), 77–85.
  17. Pranata, R., & Ulandari, E. (2021). Teacher teaching style and student learning interest in integrative learning. Journal of Education, 9(1), 65–74.
  18. Prasetyo, H. (2019). The influence of learning strategies based on ability levels on learning outcomes and learning interests of junior high school students (Unpublished thesis). Semarang State University, Semarang.
  19. Pratham Foundation. (2022). Teaching at the Right Level: Approach and implementation. New Delhi: Pratham Education Foundation.
  20. Rahmawati, D. (2020). Implementation of the TaRL approach in mathematics learning in elementary schools. Journal of Mathematics Education Scholars, 4(1), 45–56.
  21. Sardiman, AM (2014). Interaction and motivation in teaching and learning. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada.
  22. Septianingrum, F., & Nurhabibah, S. (2020). The effectiveness of TaRL implementation on students' conceptual understanding. Journal of Elementary School Learning Innovation, 8(2), 89–97.
  23. Slameto. (2010). Learning and the factors that influence it. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
  24. Sugiyono. (2019). Quantitative, qualitative, and R&D research methods. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  25. Susanti, L. (2017). The relationship between learning interest and student activeness in Islamic Education learning in junior high schools (Unpublished thesis). State Islamic Institute.
  26. Syah, M. (2013). Psychology of learning. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
  27. Tomlinson, C. A. (2014). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
  28. Uno, HB (2016). Motivation theory and its measurement: Analysis in the field of education. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
  29. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  30. Wulandari, S. (2020). The role of interactive learning media in increasing elementary school students' interest in learning. Journal of Educational Technology, 8(1), 55–63.
  31. Zubair, M., & Aulia, R. (2021). The role of initial assessment in differentiated learning in junior high school. Journal of Secondary Education, 4(2), 99–108.