Main Article Content

Abstract

The main problem in this study is that Community Empowerment in West Bandung Regency has not been effective, which is indicated by the existence of five villages with very underdeveloped categories. The ineffectiveness of community empowerment in the five very underdeveloped villages is thought to be caused by institutional development that has not been maximized and community participation is still relatively low. The research approach according to the problems raised is a quantitative approach with survey methods. The population size in this study was 408, the sampling technique used was a two-level simple random sampling technique, with a sample size of 193. Data collection techniques were carried out by: Observation, distributing questionnaires and interviews. While the data analysis technique was carried out using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) with the Linear Structural Relationship (LISREL) 8.80 application. The research results prove that both partially and simultaneously Institutional Development and community participation have a positive and significant effect on community empowerment in five very underdeveloped villages in West Bandung Regency.

Keywords

Institutional Development Community Participation Community Empowerment

Article Details

How to Cite
Rukayat, Y. ., & Harits, B. . (2022). The Influence of Institutional Development and Community Participation on Community Empowerment of Very Underdeveloping Villages in West Bandung District. Pasundan Social Science Development, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.56457/pascidev.v3i1.29

References

  1. Eko, Sutoro. 2004. Reformasi Politik dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat. Yogyakarta. APMD Press.
  2. Esman, Milton J., 1972. The Elements of Institution Building, dalam Eaton, J.W., Institution Building and Development from Concepts to Application. London. Sage Publication, Inc., Beverly Hills.
  3. Fahrudin,2012. Pengantar Kesejahteraan Sosial. Bandung: Refika. Aditama.
  4. Friedmann, John. 1992. Empowerment: The Politics of Alternative Development. Cambridge: Blacwell.
  5. Hikmat, Harry. 2001. Strategi Pemberdayaan Masyarakat. Bandung. Humaniora Utama Press.
  6. Ife, Jim. 1997. Community Development, Creating Community Al¬ternatives —Vision, Analysis and Practice. Melbourne. Addison Wesley Longman.
  7. Kartasasmita, Ginanjar. 1996. Pembangunan Untuk Rakyat (Memadu¬kan Pertumbuhan & Pemerataan), Jakarta: CIDES., 1997, Administrasi Pembangunan: Perkemban¬gan Peinikiran dan Prakteknya di Indonesia, Jakarta: Pustakit LP3ES.
  8. Mardikanto, Totok dan Soebiato Poerwoko. 2013. Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Dalam Perspektif Kebijakan Publik. Bandung. Alfabeta.
  9. Pranaka dan Vidhyandika. 1996. Pemberdayaan, dalam Onny S.P. dan AMW Pranaka (ed), 1996, Pemberdayaan. Konsep, Kebijakan dan Implementasi. Jakarta. Centre for Strategic and Interna¬tional Studies (CSIS).
  10. Rosidin, Utang. 2019. Pemberdayaan Desa Dalam Sistem Pemerintahan Daerah. Bandung. Pustaka Setia.
  11. Suharto, Edi, 1997, Pembangunan Kebijakan Sosial dan Pekerjaan Sosial. Spektrum Pemikiran. Bandung. LSP, STKS.,
  12. ________ 2005, Membangun Masyarakat Memberdayakan Rakyat: Kajian Strategis Pembangunan Kesejahteraan Sosial. Bandung. Refika Aditama.
  13. Suhartono, 2000 Politik Lokal Parlemen Desa.Yogyakarta. Lapera Pustaka Utama.
  14. Suhendra, K. 2006. Peranan Birokrasi dalam Pemberdayaan Masyarakat. Bandung. STKSPRESS.
  15. Sumodiningrat, Gunawan. 1999. Pemberdayaan Masyarakat & JPS. Jakarta. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
  16. Suryono, Agus. 2010. Dimensi-Dimensi Prima Teori Pembangunan. Malang. Universitas Brawijaya Press.
  17. Theresia, Andini, Nugraha dan Mardikanto 2014. Pembangunan Berbasis Masyarakat. Acuan bagi Praktisi, Akedmisi, dan Pemerhati Pengembangan Masyarakat. Bandung. Alfabeta.
  18. Wheelen, T.L. & J. David Hunger. 1992. Strategic Management and Business Policy. New York. Addison, Wesley Publishing Com¬pany.
  19. Wrihatnolo dan Dwidjowijoto. 2007. Manajemen Pemberdayaan. Jakarta. Elex Media Komputindo