Main Article Content

Abstract

The main problems in this study are directed at the model of the implementation of the Regional Spatial Planning policy in practice has not run effectively in realizing sustainable urban development in Banjar City. The research method used by researchers is descriptive analysis, while the type of approach used in this study is qualitative. Descriptive analysis method aims to describe complex social reality by applying concepts that have been developed in social science / public administration. Whereas the qualitative approach was chosen with the consideration that this approach is expected to obtain true data and be able to examine research problems in depth so that the expected results can be obtained. The results of the study can be stated that there are factors that lead to the implementation of the Regional Spatial Plan (RTRW) policy in realizing sustainable city development in Banjar City can run effectively, namely Policy standards and objectives, Resources and incentives, The quality of inter-organizational relationship , The characteristics of implementation agencies, the economic, social and political environment and the 'dispositon' or response of the implementers. However, based on the results of the research, these factors have not been entirely effective. The factors that have not been implemented effectively are the Policy standards and objectives and the "dispositon" or response of the implementers. Therefore there are still problems faced with regard to the Regional Spatial Planning (RTRW) policy, so that it has not been able to provide the best way to regulate, make the best use of spatial planning in the region by considering the level of needs, especially the development sector in urban areas. Disamaping also the results of the study suggest that there is a model in implementing the Regional Spatial Plan policy in realizing sustainable city development in Banjar City, namely synthesis / hybrid models by elaborating the interests of the Central Government, Provincial and Community Participation. This means that the RTRW policy both in planning and in its implementation elaborates by involving the Central Government, West Java Province and the participation of the Banjar City community. Although the policy is decentralized, the central and provincial governments still have a stake in controlling and overseeing the policies of the regional layout plan in realizing sustainable urban development in Banjar City.

Keywords

Spatial Planning Policy Realizing Sustainable Cities

Article Details

How to Cite
Al Amin, D. A. ., Alamsyah, K. ., & Salamah, U. . (2022). Implementation Model of Regional Spatial Planning Policy in Realizing Sustainable City Development in Banjar City: (Banjar City Regional Regulation Study No. 9 of 2014 concerning Banjar City Spatial Planning). Pasundan Social Science Development, 2(2), 10–24. https://doi.org/10.56457/pascidev.v2i2.22

References

  1. Abidin, Zainal. 2006. Filafat Manusia: Manusia Memahami Melalui Filsafat. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya
  2. Agustino, Leo. 2008. Kebijakan Publik. Bandung: CV. Alfabeta.
  3. Anderson, James E. 2006. Public Policy Making: An Introduction. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
  4. Arikunto, Suharsimi. 1992. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktis. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
  5. Budiharjo, Eko dan Djoko Sujarto. 2009. Kota Berkelanjutan. Bandung: PT Alumni
  6. Budiharjo, Eko. 1995. Pendekatan Sistem dalam Tata Ruang dan Pembangunan Daerah untuk Meningkatkan Ketahanan Nasional. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.
  7. Creswell, John W. 2005. Research Design: Qualitative and Quantitative Approach. California: Sage Publication.
  8. Denhardt, Janet Vinzant and Denhardt, Robert B. 2004. The New Public Service: Serving, Not Steering. New York: M.E. Sharpe.
  9. Dunn, William N. 2000. Analisis Kebijakan Publik. Terjemahan Darwin, Muhajir. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.
  10. Dwiyanto, Agus & Bevaola. 2005. Policy Brief. Centre Population and Policy Studies. UGM Yogyakarta
  11. Dye, Thomas R. 2012. Understanding Public Policy. USA : Prentice-Hall, INC., Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
  12. Edward III, George C. 1980. Implementing Public Policy. Washington: Congressional Quarterly Press.
  13. Farland, Dalton. E, Mc. 1999. Management. New York: Macmillan Pubishing.
  14. Flippo, Edwin B. 2006. Principles of Personnel Management. New York: McGraw Hill Books.
  15. Grindle, M.S., 2004. Getting Good Government: Capacity Building in the Public Sector of Developing Countries.Boston, MA: Harvard Institute for International Development.
  16. Garna, Judistira K. 1999.Metode Penelitian Pendekatan Kualitatif. Bandung: Primco Akademika
  17. Harits, Benyamin. 2006. Teori Organisasi. Bandung: Insani Press.
  18. Harmon, Michael M. dan Richard T. Mayor, 1986. Organization Theory for Public Administration, Boston: Little, Brown & Co.
  19. Haughton, J., Khandker, S.R. 2009. Handbook on Poverty and Inequality (versi elektronik). The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development /World Bank.
  20. Henry, Nicholas. 1993. Administrasi Negara dan Masalah-Masalah Kenegaraan. Terjemahan: Luciana D. Lontoh. Jakarta: Rajawali.
  21. Hoogerwerf, A. 2000. Ilmu Pemerintahan. Jakarta: Erlangga
  22. Hogwood, Brian W, and Lewis A. Gunn. 1986. Policy Analysis for the Real World. Oxford University Press.
  23. Irwan, Prasetya. 1999. Logika dan Prosedur Penelitian, Pengantar Teori dan Panduan Praktis Penelitian Sosial bagi Mahasiswa dan Peneliti Pemula. Jakarta: STIA LAN Press.
  24. Islamy, M. Irfan. 2015. Prinsip-Prinsip Perumusan Kebijaksanaan Negara. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
  25. Istanto. Sugeng F., 2012, Beberapa Segi Hubungan Pemerintah Pusat dan Daerah Dalam Negara Kesatuan Indonesia, Karya Putra, Yogyakarta.
  26. Jones, Charles O., 1996. An Introduction to The Study of Public Policy. Alih bahasa oleh Ricky Istanto, Jakarta: Raja Grafika Persada.
  27. Jenkins, W.I. 1978. Policy Analysis, Oxford: Martin Robertson.
  28. Kaloh. 2007. Mencari Bentuk Otonomi Daerah.Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
  29. Kartasasmita, Ginandjar. 2007. Administrasi Pembangunan, Perkembangan Pemikiran dan Prakteknya di Indonesia. Cetakan Pertama. Jakarta: LP3ES.
  30. Keban T. Yeremias. 2009. “Good Governance” dan “Capacity Building” sebagai Indikator Utama dan Fokus Penilaian. Jurnal Perencanaan Pembangunan. Jakarta.
  31. Kuntjoroningrat. 2003. Antropologi. Jakarta : Rineka Cipta
  32. Lembaga Administrasi Negara Republik Indonesia. 2014. Sistem Administrasi Negara Republik Indonesia (jilid 1). Jakarta: Gunung Agung.
  33. Maarse F. 2003. Implementation of Public Policies. Swets North America : Berwyn.
  34. Mazmanian, Sabatier. 1983. Implementation and Publik Policy. Cetakan ke-6. USA: Scott, Foresman and Company.
  35. Meter, Donald Van, dan Carl Van Horn. 2008. The Policy Implementation Process: A Conceptual Framework dalam Administration and Society. London : Sage.
  36. Moleong, Lexi J. 2009. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
  37. Mustopadidjaja. 2003. Manajemen Proses Kebijakan Publik. Jakarta: Lembaga Administrasi Negara.
  38. Nawawi, Hadari. 1998. Metode Penelitian Sosial. Yogyakarta: Gajah Mada University Press.
  39. Nasution. 2000. Metode Research (Penelitian Ilmiah). Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
  40. Ndraha, Taliziduhu. 2001. Ilmu Pemerintahan (Kybernology). Bandung: ProgramPascasarjana S2 dan S3 Ilmu Pemerintahan. Kerjasama IIP-UNPAD.
  41. Nigro, Felix A, dan Nigro. 2003. Modern Public Administration. New York: Harper & Row Publisher.
  42. Notoatmodjo, S. 2003. Metodologi Pendidikan dan Pelatihan Pegawai. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
  43. Nugroho, Riant. 2014. Public Policy. Jakarta: PT. Elex Media Komputindo.
  44. Pasolong, Harbani. 2010. Teori Administrasi Publik. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  45. Pfiffner, John Mc Donald. 2005. Principles of Public Administration. California: Ronald Press.
  46. Presthus, Robert. 2005. Public Administration. New York: The Ronald Press Company.
  47. Robbins, Stephen, P. 2004. Teori Organisasi: Struktur, Desain dan Aplikasi. Ed. 3 Alih Bahasa: Jusuf Udayana. Jakarta: Arcan.
  48. Rosenbloom, David H. & Deborah D. Goldman. 1989. Public Administration: Understanding Management, Politics, and Law in the public Sector. New York: Random House, Edisi Kedua.
  49. Santosa, Pandji. 2008. Administrasi Publik, Teori dan Aplikasi Good Governance. Cetakan Pertama. Bandung: PT. Refika Aditama.
  50. Sensions, Katty. 2003. The New Local Governance and Capacity Building: A Strategic Approach. Regional Development Stud-ies. Vol. 3, p.l48-150
  51. Siagian, Sondang P. 2007. Filsafat Administrasi. Jakarta: PT. Gunung Agung.
  52. Singarimbun, Masri dan Sofian Effendi. 2005. Metode Penelitian Survei. Cetakan Ke II. Jakarta: LP3ES.
  53. Soehartono, Irawan. 2000. Metode Penelitian Sosial. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.s
  54. Sugiyono. 2001. Metode Penelitian Administrasi. Bandung: Al-fabeta
  55. Supriatna, Tjahya. 1996. Administrasi Birokrasi dan Pelayanan Publik. Jakarta: Nimas Multima.
  56. Supriyanto, Sani Ahmad. 2007. Metodologi Penelitian Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Malang : UIN-Maliki Press.
  57. Tachjan. 2008. Implementasi Kebijakan Publik, Bandung: AIPI Bandung – Puslit KP2W Lemlit Unpad.
  58. Tarigan, Robinson. 2012. Perencanaan Pembangunan Wilayah, Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
  59. Thoha, Miftah. 2008. Perilaku Organisasi Konsep Dasar dan Aplikasinya. Jakarta: Rajawali.
  60. Tjokroamidjojo, Bintoro. 2004. Perencanaan Pembangunan. Cetakan ke-19, Jakarta: Gunung Agung.
  61. Udoji, Chief J.O, 2001. The African Public Servant As a Public Policy in Africa. Addis Abeba: African Association for Public Administration and Management.
  62. Utomo, Warsito. 2008. Administrasi Publik Baru di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
  63. Wahab, Solichin Abdul. 2010. Analisis Kebijakan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
  64. Warsito. 2007. Administrasi Publik Baru di Indonesia. Yogyakarta : Pustaka Pelajar.
  65. White. Jay. D. 2005. Research in Public Administration. Universitas Michigan Sage Publications.
  66. Wibawa, Samudra. 2004. Evaluasi Kebijakan Publik. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
  67. Wilson, Woodrow. 1887. The Study of Administration. Political science quarterly 2 (2): 197–222. Diunduh 8 Februari 2013.