Main Article Content

Abstract

PG Tjoekir Jombang is a sugar production company that uses production machines for cost efficiency and to increase the homogeneity of production quality. This activity causes noise exposure in the workplace which threatens the comfort and health of workers. This study aims to analyze the noise level in the work area of ??the Tjoekir Jombang Sugar Factory (PG) and its relationship to non-auditory complaints experienced by workers. The method used is a descriptive quantitative approach through direct measurement of noise using a sound level meter and distributing questionnaires to 60 respondents. The measurement results show that most work areas have noise levels exceeding the threshold of 85 dB(A) at the grinding, cooking, turning, finishing and power house stations.. Mapping using Surfer software produces 3 zones, namely high intensity levels in red > 85 dB (A), yellow to orange at 80-85 dB (A), and low levels <85 dB (A). The Chi-Square test showed a significant relationship between noise intensity and non-auditory complaints (p < 0.05). The results of the Chi-Square test showed a significant relationship between noise levels and communication disorders (p = 0.007) and psychological disorders (p = 0.033). However, the relationship with Physiological complaints was not significant (p = 0.354). These findings indicate that noise has a real impact on certain aspects of health, so appropriate control efforts need to be made.

Keywords

Sound Intensity Level Non-Auditory Complaints Chi-Square Surfer Mapping

Article Details

How to Cite
Ningsih, N. (2025). Analysis and Mapping of Noise Intensity on Workers’ Non-Auditory Complaints at Tjoekir Sugar Factory, Jombang. Pasundan Social Science Development, 5(2), 300–307. https://doi.org/10.56457/pascidev.v5i2.219

References

  1. International Labour Organization. Working Environment (Air Pollution, Noise and Vibration) Recommendation, 1977 (No. 156). International Labour Office, 1977.
  2. Sun, X. Occupational noise exposure and worker’s health in China. China CDC Weekly, 3(18), 2021.375–377. https://doi.org/10.46234/ccdcw2021.102
  3. Indrayani, R. I., Nurrahmi, I., & Maulidina, S. Hubungan paparan kebisingan dengan keluhan subyektif non-auditory pada pekerja konstruksi PT. X Kabupaten Gresik. Jurnal Ilmu Kesehatan Masyarakat, 11(2), 148–156. 2020. https://doi.org/10.19184/ikesma.v11i2.18430
  4. Buksh N, Nargis Y, Yun C, He D, Ghufran M. Occupational Noise Exposure And Its Impact On Worker’s Health And Activities. International Journal of Public Health and Clinical Sciences. 2018;5(2):180–195. http://publichealthmy.org/ ejournal/ojs2/index.php/Ijphcs/article/view/527/45
  5. Tarwaka, P. G. Dip. Sc., M. Erg. Ergonomi industri: Dasar dasar pengetahuan ergonomi dan aplikasi di tempat kerja (Edisi II). Surakarta: Harapan Press. 2014.
  6. Fransiscus, Fransiscus. LKP : Program PLC Mesin HGF pada Pabrik Gula Tjoekir. Undergraduate thesis, Stikom Surabaya. 2014.
  7. Khoirun Nisa’, R. N. Analisis Tingkat Kebisingan pada Proses Produksi Gula pada Stasiun Masakan, Puteran, dan Power House di PG Semboro 2013.(Skripsi, Universitas Jember).
  8. Sasmita, A., Elystia, S., & Asmura, J. Evaluasi tingkat kebisingan sebagai upaya pengelolaan kesehatan dan keselamatan kerja (K3) di Unit PLTD/G Teluk Lembu PT PLN Pekanbaru dengan metode NIOSH.2016. Jurnal Sains dan Teknologi, 15(2), 34–42.